|
|
Post by WaterWizard on Jun 7, 2010 12:19:04 GMT -8
Let's figure this out now. Or later?
|
|
|
|
Post by Crystal_ on Jun 7, 2010 12:20:34 GMT -8
Voted six although I prefer 5 (Uber, OU, BL, UU, NU) because if I had voted other, you would have thought that I wanted 356.
|
|
|
|
Post by t3h Icy on Jun 7, 2010 12:30:07 GMT -8
Lol my post got deleted.
I would say 6, but more importantly, the tiers need balancing.
|
|
Underboss
Member
Rock On Kadabra!!!
Posts: 212
|
Post by Underboss on Jun 7, 2010 15:00:19 GMT -8
Voted for "Eventually, but we should work with 6 for now." I think people will change their minds once it becomes clear that a bloated UberUU is not going away and the BL metagame needs to be legitimized. And people will also realize that adding two new ban tiers that will have only have like 2-3 pokemon in it will be no big deal to accomplish. Adding the two new ban tiers is just to formally organize and recognize the legitimacy of the BL metagame.
|
|
|
|
Post by WaterWizard on Jun 7, 2010 22:38:27 GMT -8
hmm seems pretty clear. commence with UU experimentation now.
|
|
Underboss
Member
Rock On Kadabra!!!
Posts: 212
|
Post by Underboss on Jun 7, 2010 23:57:52 GMT -8
Yeah, remake UU and then we'll know what we are dealing with in BL. But I'm 80% sure it will still be bloated enough to have its own metagame after you guys fix UU and NU.
|
|
|
|
Post by Crystal_ on Jun 8, 2010 2:21:59 GMT -8
Lol, who has voted the third?!?!
|
|
|
|
Post by subsmoke on Jun 8, 2010 3:31:06 GMT -8
I'd stick with 5 and get rid of NU ubers. And we can put the stuff that's too powerful for NU like Machamp into UU.
|
|
|
|
Post by Crystal_ on Jun 8, 2010 3:38:51 GMT -8
But Machamp cannot be moved to UU sice nobody uses it there. And, besides for Poliwhril, I think that the NU tier is pretty well balanced.
And Arcanine imo should be moved to NU because it isn't used in UU. Blastoise and Pory perhaps too.
|
|
|
|
Post by subsmoke on Jun 8, 2010 3:46:43 GMT -8
Yeah but Machamp can be put in UU because of its power. No other choice really unless you wanna have an NU ban tier.
|
|
|
|
Post by Crystal_ on Jun 8, 2010 3:51:43 GMT -8
By definition a Pokemon cannot me moved to a non-ban for his power in the lower tier.
Therefore, Machamp could only be moved to UU, if it started being used there (usage).
And, anyway, I have played some NU and Machamp isn't that great.
|
|
Underboss
Member
Rock On Kadabra!!!
Posts: 212
|
Post by Underboss on Jun 8, 2010 6:44:15 GMT -8
Machamp is definitely NU because it doesn't see use in UU. And it's funny because it actually can do well in OU.
|
|
|
|
Post by posthuman on Jun 8, 2010 10:18:40 GMT -8
Why would you make this topic underboss if you were just going to completely disregard the community decision?
|
|
Underboss
Member
Rock On Kadabra!!!
Posts: 212
|
Post by Underboss on Jun 8, 2010 10:51:47 GMT -8
Author: WaterWizard I didn't start this poll  And I'm just trying to have people visual 8 tiers. |
|
|
|
Post by subsmoke on Jun 8, 2010 14:57:43 GMT -8
We can do whatever we want. It's our shit  I would just do whatever makes the most balanced tiers. |
|
|
|
Post by posthuman on Jun 8, 2010 16:07:38 GMT -8
oh oops sorry bout that
|
|
I would just do whatever makes the most balanced tiers.